Imperialism 2.0: Why Africa - Ernest Makulilo Audiobook
Shared by:daenigma100
Imperialism has been seen as the highest stage of capitalism. But what we are now witnessing around the world is the upgraded imperialism, which I call Imperialism 2.0. Under the upgraded Imperialism 2.0, the game has changed. African countries were hoping to “develop” soon after colonialism. But with Imperialism 2.0, Africa is still under new colonialism and will be subjected to it in different shapes and forms until the end of the world, unfortunately.
This book, Imperialism 2.0, answers the question of why Africa will continue to be poor and colonized for centuries to come. The book goes further to provide what should be done to end it and develop a strong independent economy.
| Announce URL: | |
| This Torrent also has several backup trackers | |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.leechers-paradise.org:6969 |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969 |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.open-internet.nl:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.torrent.eu.org:451/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.tiny-vps.com:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://open.demonii.si:1337/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://thetracker.org:80/announce |
| Tracker: | http://tracker2.dler.org:80/announce |
| Creation Date: | Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:32:11 +0100 |
| This is a Multifile Torrent | |
| Ernest Makulilo - Imperialism 2.0.mp3 72.01 MBs | |
| File Size: | 72.01 MBs |
| Piece Size: | 128 KBs |
| Comment: | Updated by History Audiobook |
| Encoding: | UTF-8 |
| Info Hash: | 2cc1fb6d17c17012b1e88265d42b528294ae6e8a |
| Torrent Download: | Torrent Free Downloads |
| Tips: | Sometimes the torrent health info isn’t accurate, so you can download the file and check it out or try the following downloads. |
| Direct Download: | Start Direct Download |
| Tips: | You could try out alternative bittorrent clients. |
| Secured Download: | Download Files Now |
| AD: |
|
This post has 8 comments
August 8th, 2019
If Africa hadn’t experienced colonialism, it would be even worse. The British colonies would probably be better off if they were still were colonies. I bet Kenya would be like Costa Rica.
August 9th, 2019
@AndyBook - Well done for winning today’s most outstanding award for Commentus Ignoramus
August 10th, 2019
Packs,
Sort of interesting. Why do you think that’s winning?
August 10th, 2019
AndyBook, are you aware that you are racist? I truly wonder if you know this. (Note: I usually just term one’s argument or assumption as racist, not people themselves. But in regard to you, AndyBook, I get the impression that racism undergirds — and, in fact, corrupts — your entire thought process, and your ability to distinguish fact from fiction, etc.)
August 10th, 2019
Silly.
August 11th, 2019
Racism is a logical fallacy of an argument. If you don’t agree with AndyBook, present some argument, that isn’t just ad hominem, to back your claim.
There are good talking points on both sides of the colonialism issue. For instance…
Colonialism bad:
1) Primitive tribal societies (of which some in Africa were at the time of contact) tend to do poorly when their culture is overwritten by that of another, generally technologically more advanced culture.
2) New diseases and illnesses can depopulate entire swaths of the African continent, as small pox did during the slave trade.
3) At least when slaves were taken by neighboring tribes they had some chance of escaping into an environment they were raised in, possibly even back to their own tribes. This wasn’t the case when they were exported, like the chattel they were treated as, to an entirely different continent.
4) The EU wouldn’t currently be killing burgeoning African dairy industries continent wide with absurdly cheap subsidized exports (DW has a youtube documentary on this if anyone is interested, sounds insane, but the EU is actually undercutting native farmers in the region.)
Okay, now arguments that colonialism was good:
1) After the initial die offs due to small pox and other non-native illnesses, average life expectancy increased due to the introduction of better medical care.
2) Western medicine has been able to considerably reduce the impact of certain endemic illnesses native to the continent, such as malaria and dengue fever.
3) As a result of Western farming practices food shortages, as well as water shortages, have been reduced to some extent in many parts of the continent. Ultra efficient hydroponic farming, often conducted in re-purposed shipping containers, has also started in areas like Nigeria, which promises a considerable furthering of this trend.
4) Education, albeit often partially religious in nature, has allowed some Africans to better their lives as well as the lives of those around them.
5) International aid has reduced the issues caused by food and water shortages, where, for whatever reason, other interventions have failed. ‘For only .39 cents a day, less than the price of a cup of coffee…’
My point here is not that one side is right or that another is wrong, but that it is a grey area. Africa would be worse in some ways if not for colonialism, but it would be better in other ways. Mixed blessing is the term I’d use.
September 2nd, 2019
No more;
Millions of Trump haters marching
Race riots
School walkouts
Coast2coastANTIFA
Weekly statue riots
Campus antifree speech
Road blockades
Mass flag burnings
#CNN
#NFL
Occupy
PoorMeToo
BlackLivesMatter
Iraq War
Oil wars
October 2nd, 2019
Okay, so as endless media has explained to me, everything bad in any African nation is the fault of anyone BUT the African citizens and leaders. Now can you explain Ethiopia, which remained relatively untouched during colonialism?
I understand that the new narrative (and the only acceptable one) is that everything negative that happens to anyone with a skin shade darker than “mocha latte” clearly has to be the fault of those with skin tones lighter than that, but it doesn’t really fit neatly into most historical contexts when you look a bit deeper into history before colonialism.
Add a comment